Introduction
Sele Yalaghuli’s article, South Africa and BRICS: Assessing the Flying Geese Strategy as a Re-Distributional Mechanism for Inclusive Economic Gains, provides a compelling analysis of South Africa’s role within the BRICS economic bloc. The author employs the Flying Geese model to explore industrial redistribution strategies that could enable South Africa to address its pressing socioeconomic challenges. This review examines the article’s theoretical contributions, empirical insights, and policy recommendations while suggesting areas for further exploration.
Theoretical Contributions
Application of the Flying Geese Model
The adaptation of the Flying Geese model, a concept rooted in East Asia’s economic rise, to the BRICS context is one of the article’s key theoretical innovations. Initially formulated by Akamatsu (1937), the model explains how industrial advancements cascade from lead economies to less developed ones in a V-formation. Yalaghuli’s application of this framework to South Africa’s industrial development is both innovative and timely, as it extends the model’s relevance beyond its traditional Asian focus (Kumagai, 2008; Kojima, 2000). By identifying China as the “lead goose,” the article highlights how South Africa could leverage its BRICS membership to develop industries like textiles that are being relinquished by China due to rising production costs and demographic shifts.
The integration of the Cobb-Douglas production function to assess the relationship between input factors and output among BRICS members further enriches the theoretical discourse. This mathematical underpinning demonstrates the economic efficiency of reallocating industrial activities, as shown in studies of other latecomer economies (Yang & Cao, 2023).
Geopolitical Framing
The article situates the Flying Geese model within the broader geopolitical aspirations of BRICS. Yalaghuli argues that equitable economic development within the bloc is critical for challenging Western hegemony, echoing the themes of South-South cooperation articulated by Duggan et al. (2022) and Chatterjee & Naka (2022). This geopolitical lens strengthens the model’s applicability to BRICS, where economic redistribution is not only about growth but also about fostering unity against unipolar dominance.
Empirical Insights
Comparative GDP and Export Analysis
Yalaghuli’s comparative analysis of GDP compositions and export patterns from 2010 to 2022 provides a robust empirical foundation for the study. The data highlights significant disparities between South Africa and its BRICS counterparts, particularly in industrial output and export composition. For example, South Africa’s reliance on raw material exports, such as coal and iron ore, contrasts sharply with China’s dominance in capital goods exports (Statista, 2023). This disparity underscores the structural challenges South Africa faces in aligning with the manufacturing-led growth seen in other BRICS nations (Kundu, 2014).
The earmarking of textiles as a focus industry is particularly insightful. The study reveals that textile manufacturing is already shifting from China to economies like Ethiopia, driven by lower labor costs (Ruan & Zhang, 2014). This trend aligns with the Flying Geese model’s prediction of industrial migration and offers a practical pathway for South Africa to revitalize its manufacturing sector. However, as Yalaghuli notes, South Africa’s success in this area will depend on addressing domestic constraints, including energy instability and high unemployment.
Socioeconomic Challenges
The article’s discussion of South Africa’s socioeconomic challenges is compelling. With 59.4% youth unemployment and a Gini coefficient of 0.65, South Africa remains one of the most unequal societies globally (Statistics South Africa, 2024). These statistics are crucial in contextualizing the urgency of industrial development. By linking these challenges to South Africa’s underperformance within BRICS, Yalaghuli strengthens the argument for adopting redistributional mechanisms like the Flying Geese strategy.
Policy Recommendations
Textile Manufacturing Pact
One of the most actionable recommendations in the article is the proposal for a textile manufacturing pact between South Africa and China. This pact would not only create jobs but also help South Africa develop a competitive manufacturing base. The author’s suggestion that South Africa leverage its youthful labor force to absorb labor-intensive industries aligns with the experiences of other latecomer economies, such as Vietnam and Bangladesh (Xu & Cao, 2019).
However, the article could further explore the political and economic feasibility of such a pact. For instance, would China’s willingness to share market space extend to significant technology transfers, or would South Africa need to negotiate these separately? Additionally, the potential environmental impacts of expanding textile manufacturing warrant consideration, given the global push for sustainable industrial practices (Brautigam et al., 2018).
Energy Infrastructure
While the article identifies energy instability as a major barrier, it does not delve deeply into potential solutions. Addressing South Africa’s energy crisis is essential for any industrial strategy to succeed. Yalaghuli could enhance this discussion by examining how renewable energy investments or partnerships within BRICS might alleviate these constraints (Vayez, 2023).
Areas for Further Exploration
Quantitative Projections
While the article provides a strong qualitative analysis, additional quantitative projections could strengthen its policy recommendations. For instance, modeling the impact of a textile pact on South Africa’s GDP and employment rates over the next decade would offer a clearer picture of the strategy’s potential benefits (Nagar, 2023).
Broader Sectoral Applications
Expanding the analysis to other sectors, such as automotive or renewable energy, could provide a more comprehensive view of South Africa’s industrial potential. These sectors align with global trends and could offer additional avenues for collaboration within BRICS (Palma, 2009).
Conclusion
Sele Yalaghuli’s article is a significant contribution to the discourse on BRICS and its potential as a platform for inclusive economic development. By applying the Flying Geese model to South Africa’s context, the study bridges theoretical innovation with practical policy recommendations. Its emphasis on equitable redistribution within BRICS is both timely and necessary for fostering unity in the Global South. However, future research should incorporate quantitative projections, address energy infrastructure challenges, and explore additional sectors to enhance the analysis further.
Bibliography
- Akamatsu, K. (1937). « Waga kuni Keizai hatten no sougou bensyoho. » Shogyo Keizai Ronso, 15, 179-210.
- Brautigam, D., Xiaoyang, T., & Xia, Y. (2018). « What kinds of Chinese ‘Geese’ are flying to Africa? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms. » CARI Working Policy No. 17.
- Chatterjee, M., & Naka, I. (2022). « Twenty years of BRICS: Political and economic transformations through the lens of land. » Oxford Development Studies, 50, 2-13.
- Duggan, N., Hooijmaaijers, B., & Rewizorski, M. (2022). « The BRICS, Global Governance, and Challenges for South-South Cooperation in a Post-Western World. » International Political Science Review, 43, 469-480.
- Kumagai, S. (2008). « A journey through the secret history of the Flying Geese Model. » IDE Discussion Papers, 158.
- Nagar, M. (2023). « South Africa is failing to live up to its constitution. » The Conversation, July 27.
- Palma, J. G. (2009). « Flying Geese and Waddling Ducks: The Different Capabilities of East Asia and Latin America to ‘Demand-Adapt’ and ‘Supply-Upgrade’ their Export Productive Capacity. » In Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation (pp. 203-238). Oxford University Press.
- Ruan, J., & Zhang, X. (2014). « Flying Geese in China: The textile and apparel industry’s pattern of migration. » Journal of Asian Economics, 34, 79-91.
- Statista (2023). « Distribution of the gross domestic product (GDP) across economic sectors in China from 2012 to 2022. » Retrieved from Statista.
- Vayez, A. (2023). « Evolving Multilateralism: BRICS, the EU, and Responses to the Russian-Ukraine Conflict. » Africa Policy Research Institute.
Jimmy Yab 